
Part 2: The Promise vs the Risk
This is the second installment in Part 2 of our 5-part series, where BackBox CEO Rekha Shenoy discusses key questions about the promise versus the risk of AI in networks.
Here, we explore why AI hallucinations, bias, and data quality issues are especially serious in network automation. In network infrastructure, errors or unexpected behaviors can lead to outages or cause security exposures. It's crucial to understand the use case for AI in the network as well as the organization's level of fault tolerance to weigh the risk against your capacity to actively manage and mitigate it.
For more details on using AI for network automation, visit our BackBox Platform Page. Ready to get started? Request a demoto see our solution in action.
Be sure to check out other blogs and videos in this series, including:
Related content

Article
AI Network Automation Myths That Are Costing NetOps Teams Time
What can AI network automation actually deliver? A clear-eyed look at real capabilities, real limits, and how to evaluate vendor claims. Try BackBox.
Read Now
Article
What Is Network Automation and Why Is It Critical for Modern Networks?
What is network automation? Learn how it works, why it's critical for modern networks, and how BackBox automates network tasks across 180+ vendors.
Read Now
Article
Linking Cloud Maturity to Ignite Today’s AI Adoption Curve
BackBox Field CFO Irfahn Khimji compares the cloud adoption curve to today's AI rush, sharing lessons on complexity, security, cost, and skills gaps.
Read Now
See for yourself how consistent and reliable your device backups and upgrades can be
Written by
Stephanie Stouck
